TheConnector vs TradingConnector: a fair comparison
TradingConnector has bridged TradingView to MetaTrader for years with a deliberately local approach: a small program running on your own machine forwards each alert to MT4, MT5 or Interactive Brokers with very low latency, for a modest monthly price. TheConnector takes the opposite architecture: a hosted gateway that keeps working when your computer does not, adds cTrader, and starts on a permanent free Basic tier hosted in France/EU. TradingConnector is a third-party brand, not affiliated with TheConnector. Trading carries a risk of capital loss.
Two opposite architectures
TradingConnector runs on your machine: the bridge lives next to your terminal, latency is excellent, and your alert data stays local — but the chain only works while your computer, your session and the bridge are all running. TheConnector is hosted: TradingView posts the webhook to the gateway, which validates the payload, maps broker symbols and routes the order to the EA or cBot; your computer can be off, and each step stays visible (Received, Routing, ACK, Delivered). Neither approach is wrong — they trade convenience against locality.
Local bridge: lowest latency, but your PC must stay on
Hosted gateway: survives reboots, sleep and outages at home
Visible Received → Routing → ACK → Delivered statuses
Where TradingConnector is strong
A fair comparison names the other side's strengths. TradingConnector has been on the market for years at a low monthly price, ships ready-made strategy examples, and supports Interactive Brokers TWS — a destination TheConnector does not cover. Its local-first design also means your alerts never transit a third-party server, which some traders explicitly prefer. If you trade through IBKR or want everything on your own machine, it is a reasonable pick.
Years on the market at a low monthly price
Interactive Brokers TWS support
Local-first: alerts never leave your machine
Which one should you choose?
If you trade MT4/MT5 or IBKR, accept keeping a machine running, and want the lowest price with full locality, TradingConnector is a sensible option. If you want routing that does not depend on your own computer, need cTrader, prefer France/EU hosting under GDPR, or want to start at zero cost on a permanent free Basic tier, TheConnector fits better. The lowest-risk move is to run TheConnector's free tier in parallel with your current setup and compare executions on a demo account first. No financial advice or execution guarantee is provided.
IBKR or full locality: TradingConnector
cTrader, hosted routing or free start: TheConnector
Lowest risk: run both in parallel on a demo
Frequently asked questions.
What is the main difference between TheConnector and TradingConnector?
Does TradingConnector support cTrader?
Do I need to keep my computer on with TheConnector?
How do the prices compare?
Can I migrate from TradingConnector to TheConnector?
Keep exploring.
Start with one alert.
TradingConnector has bridged TradingView to MetaTrader for years with a deliberately local approach: a small program running on your own machine forwards each alert to MT4, MT5 or Interactive Brokers with very low latency, for a modest monthly price. TheConnector takes the opposite architecture: a hosted gateway that keeps working when your computer does not, adds cTrader, and starts on a permanent free Basic tier hosted in France/EU. TradingConnector is a third-party brand, not affiliated with TheConnector. Trading carries a risk of capital loss.